Our AI, cybersecurity and incident response workshops and tabletops are extremely popular and highly interactive. So much so that many organizations run several of them over time, and use that cadence as third-party validation that they assess their posture regularly — which is exactly what boards, insurers and large customers now ask to see. Your team makes the call, in the room, on the day.
Half-day and full-day working sessions for leadership teams and boards, starting at $6,500 a session, built on your business rather than a template. Your team leaves with a decision written down.
What the technology actually does and does not do, where the real value has shown up in companies like yours, and how to tell a genuine use case from an expensive demo. Half day.
Your team is already using AI. This session ends with a written position on what is allowed, with what data, with what review. Half day, and you leave with the draft.
A walk-through of a realistic incident against your actual business. Who decides, who speaks, what you owe customers and regulators, and where your plan breaks. Half or full day.
What a board is accountable for, which questions to ask management, and how to read what comes back. Built for directors, not engineers. Half day.
The engagement below is real work, drawn from more than 600 AI and cybersecurity projects the people behind this firm have delivered. Names, figures and identifying details are withheld, because confidentiality does not expire when an engagement ends. Yours will get the same protection.
The setup. Associates are using AI for research and first drafts — everyone knows it, nobody says it. Two partners want a firm-wide ban, three want to lean in, and the managing partner mostly wants the argument to end before a client asks the question in a security review. Client confidentiality makes this sharper here than almost anywhere.
Before the room. We read the firm's engagement letter template, its confidentiality obligations, and the bar guidance that applies. The session is built on those, not on a generic deck — the scenarios use the firm's actual practice groups.
The half day. Morning: what these tools actually do with what you type into them, plan by plan, in plain English — which is where the ban-versus-embrace argument usually dissolves, because the real line is business-grade tools with data protections versus consumer tools without. Afternoon: the firm's AI ground rules drafted live, argued over, and settled. Approved tools by practice group. The absolute lines: client identity, privileged material, anything under protective order. Review requirements for anything court-bound. A named owner.
What leaves the room. A finished one-page policy the managing partner publishes that week, the client-facing paragraph for security questionnaires, and — the quiet win — partners who can now answer a client's AI question without flinching.
What this cost: starting at $6,500 for the half day. The version with a board or executive-committee session attached runs as a full day, starting at $9,500. Scoped and quoted in writing before the date is held.
Frequently. Many clients run several over time, an AI ground rules session, then an incident readiness tabletop, then a board session, and use that recurring cadence as third-party validation that they assess their AI and cybersecurity posture regularly. Boards, insurers and large customers now ask to see exactly that record.
Leadership teams, boards, and management groups who have to make AI and cybersecurity decisions but do not work in either field day to day.
Half day or full day, delivered on site or remote. Each is built on your business rather than delivered from a generic deck.
Before you book a session: what a leadership AI workshop actually produces, the questions your AI policy has to answer, and what a board briefing should cover.
Delivered on site or remote. half days starting at $6,500, full days starting at $9,500 — scoped to the room and agreed in writing before we build anything.